2016 NOTE: I'm leaving up this post because it was true at the time it was written. However, as noted in this subsequent posting: Bye_bye Warner Archive Instant, I have retracted my recommendation of the service. --------- |
Warner Archive Instant website home page |
In this post I'll be taking a critical look at the Warner Archive Instant Streaming Video-on-Demand service . For those of you who like to flip to the end of the book first I'll save you the trouble: this is the essential streaming service for classic film fans.
OK, I'm getting a little ahead of myself here. Perhaps I should take the time to explain just what it's all about.
WHAT IS IT? A monthly subscription video streaming service - similar to Netflix, but featuring only titles from the Warner Archive library. The biggest difference between Warner Archive Instant (I'll refer to it as WAI from here on) and other streaming services is that it focuses exclusively on classic titles from the 1920s through the 1980s that are part of the Warner library. You won't find "Harry Potter" here but you will find "Home from the Hill," "Dark of the Sun," "Night Nurse," "The Unholy Three," "The Bad and the Beautiful" and many more.
Roku Streaming Box |
WHY DO I NEED IT? Like to watch classic movies from the Warner stable of studios (Warner, MGM, RKO, Allied Artists, and many more)? Like to watch High Definition films that aren't available on Blu-ray? Want a choice of viewing over 500 different titles at any one time? Then you want Warner Archive Instant.
Now it's time for some further details, so please continue reading after the jump.
Now it's time for some further details, so please continue reading after the jump.
Actual screen shot |
Actual screen shot |
Warner upgraded the service's apps last year to have a Watchlist function, which was a great addition. One feature that I think would be terrific for them to consider for the Watchlist would be some sort of alert or pop-up that would identify titles that are scheduled to come down shortly.
The search (by title, actor, etc.) works better on the iPad or PC since typing via a keyboard is easier and faster than the clunky searching via the Roku remote and on-screen keyboard. What's great is that changes made to your Watchlist on the iPad app or PC are also reflected in the Roku app. Since I have both devices I use the iPad to search and add and the Roku to watch.
Picture quality via the Roku is 1080p though not every title is actually High Definition, however the genuine HD tiles are clearly marked with a "High Definition" banner (Warner's help section says some titles are 720p, but I don't know if I've ever noticed any). The HD titles look excellent for a streaming service - even blown up to 96" wide on my projection system. They start playing at SD but, depending on your internet speed and quality, ramp up to HD fairly quickly. Comparing them directly to their DVD counterparts shows a clear uptick in picture quality and stability. They fall a little short of actual Blu-ray quality in two areas: there are some banding and compression artifacts present. Titles that are not in HD look about the same as their DVD versions, but with a trace more compression artifacts and instability. Audio is limited to lossy Dolby Digital 2.0 - which is a disappointment - but titles that are in surround stereo are properly flagged to engage Pro Logic Surround decoding and sound pretty good though certainly not as good as uncompressed Blu-ray audio. I'd like to see them upgrade the sound to Dolby Digital Plus and discrete 5.1 at some point. But in the time I've had the service, the image and sound quality has become better so I expect it will continue to evolve and improve as compression algorithms get better. There have been occasional glitches where certain titles refuse to play - they usually get taken down (presumably for re-encoding) and then are added back. And some of the standard definition titles are the same non-remastered versions that are already available on DVD from the Archive, so there's no advantage here,
All titles appear to be in their correct original aspect ratios. The exception seems to be a small group of late-1950s crime exploitation films (such as "Born Reckless" and "The Green-Eyed Blonde") that are presented 4x3 full frame when they clearly should be 1.75 or 1.85 widescreen. Warner needs to be a little more careful here though I suspect that in each of these cases they are using a older standard definition master. Nothing that I've watched in HD has been incorrectly formatted, however.
Note the excess headroom on "The Green-Eyed Blonde" |
Each title also has a handy Resume feature, so you can pick up right where you left off. A really interesting function of the Resume is that it remembers the point even if the title has come down from the service and then returns months later. More than once I've selected a title and it says "Resume? 10% watched" having totally forgotten that I started to watch it a few months earlier and never finished.
One important thing I must mention: the service is useless without a solid high speed internet connection. Also you'd want an HDTV with HDMI input. If using the Roku, I suggest a hard-wire Ethernet connection rather than wireless if possible. Also, be aware of any caps or bandwidth charges from your ISP - the same as you would for any streaming service.
One important thing I must mention: the service is useless without a solid high speed internet connection. Also you'd want an HDTV with HDMI input. If using the Roku, I suggest a hard-wire Ethernet connection rather than wireless if possible. Also, be aware of any caps or bandwidth charges from your ISP - the same as you would for any streaming service.
In terms of the value of a service that only has a relatively limited amount of titles (though that has grown from just over a hundred a month when it first started to over 500 now) there is little to no title overlap with any other 'free' streaming service. Checking a few random titles shows they are available for paid rental elsewhere (Vudu, iTunes, Amazon, etc.) but not as part of a monthly subscription - you're paying for each as you go. I think the better value is the monthly WAI. It's best to consider it a rental service and if you value movie rentals at around $3 apiece then all you need to do is watch three to four a month to have this service pay for itself. And since the Roku box can also stream hundreds of other channels - including Netflix, Vudu, Amazon, Hulu Plus, Epix, HBO Go, et al - the cost of adding it can be considered negligible.
Best of all - the Warner Archive Instant service has a one month free trial. You can use your PC to watch selections to your heart's content and decide if you want to add a Roku to your entertainment system. I started with the free trial and within two weeks ordered up a Roku box and have never looked back. I suspect you might, too.
Best of all - the Warner Archive Instant service has a one month free trial. You can use your PC to watch selections to your heart's content and decide if you want to add a Roku to your entertainment system. I started with the free trial and within two weeks ordered up a Roku box and have never looked back. I suspect you might, too.
My biggest complaint is that one week after I joined, they removed titles (53 at one time) and only added back 4 or 5 titles. That is unbelievable for a streaming service. Are these guys awake out there in Warner Brosland? More movies means more subscribers!
ReplyDeleteI've noticed that when they do a title update sometimes all the new titles do not show up at once. The "Newly Added" section increases over the course of a couple of days. First there will be 10 or 12 new ones, then gradually 30 or 40 are up there.
ReplyDeleteIts been over two months and nothing was added.
ReplyDeleteI have had this service for two years. They have not added anything for months. They take off classic movies and replace them with 80's made-for-TV movies. It is impossible to contact anyone there. I would not bother with it, as almost all the titles are on Turner Classic Movies at one time or another.
ReplyDelete